Portal de Alhama de Murcia

www.portaldealhama.com

Alhama de Murcia - SpanishAlhama de Murcia - English
detail of Alhama de Murcia

 

IU + Greens explains the development of regular plenary session in February (03/03/2009)

Note from IU + LV:

Following approval of minutes of previous meeting, the Town Planning restated to full first amendment to the Municipal General Management Plan, this time for provisional approval is the final step that corresponds to the Council.

This change was primarily due to change in the intended location for a covered auditorium.

In IU + The Greens have not objected to the general approach in this area, but there are two issues that we highlighted.

The first concerns the Garden of Menas, which while recognizing the interest in our town of this area, we feel a real blunder to pay € 1,185,468, (200 million pesetas) a house and garden, already protected.

The second is that we consider suitable for our people have the necessary ground for a possible expansion or rehabilitation of the building now the residence of the 3 rd.

An issue that we consider indispensable, and not being taken into account by the Municipal Government has forced us to vote against it.

The third point is proposing the adoption of the revised text of the General Plan.

After being re-exposure to the public had submitted claims, all rejected, both on the classification of the Lentiscos Spot on the prohibition of installing photovoltaic systems in the area of the Ramblas.

We must remember that there are unresolved objections contained in the Executive Order issued on March 3, 2008, they were: the justification of sufficient water resources, the classification as unsectorised developable areas within the Diversion irrigation, the suitability of residential use at Hacienda San Miguel, or classification as urban land in some districts, and Units of Action in the Tejares Road, off the track, and in the Cotton.

On these issues IU + Greens showed our dissatisfaction with the proposal of Councillor for Town Planning to solve them.

Therefore, as nothing had changed since last November, we held our vote otherwise.

The second proposal on this same point, calling by the City Council to support the claims of the owners of the mastic, it seemed like a joke, after rejecting their claims, suggests this.

Pure demagoguery of those who govern, and that IU + Greens not going to participate.

The Mayor's proposal to join the Public Transport Authority of the Region of Murcia, has its basis in law creation.

During its passage IU and PSOE proposed amendments to both the full, partial and 49 others, nearly all rejected by the majority in the House of People's Party.

IU + Greens can not agree on the membership of a private entity, born two problems in the municipality of Murcia has to manage public transport in the metropolitan area.

In IU + Greens we question the powers delegated to the City Council in a private, in which there is equal treatment of those members, in the nominalist criteria applied in the appointment of members, with over representation in some cases .

On the other hand denies the participation in its advisory body to local organizations, unions and environmentalists.

We find no justification for the PSOE Councillors support the development of the private entity on which regional deputies voted against.

We support the motion on the crisis in olive oil, although it adheres to this product could easily be extended to the almond and citrus production, including livestock, since the problem for producers is the same increase in costs and lower prices paid at source.

Finally, in the order of questions and answers, raised at the Councillor for the Environment the dire situation of the pines of La Muela and neglect in the development of Local Agenda 21 which promotes the implementation of an environmental sustainability plan Alhama, with citizen participation.

Also on the containers of batteries, cardboard, plastic and glass.

We care about the lack of lighting in New Espuña Private contrast to the waste in Condado de Alhama.

And the irregular payment of Polaris, the problems caused by excessive proliferation of "pins" on our streets, removal of architectural barriers.

Worth mentioning the Municipal Government's refusal to debate the motion presented by IU + Greens on International Women's Day.

Councilwoman of the field, although in principle seemed receptive to the Motion, has demonstrated no political weight in the government, without even presenting access by consensus.

On this issue, we asked about the actions or awareness programs on equal rights, to enhance women's associations, the incorporation of women into the labor market or educational programs to prevent violence against women.

We are still waiting for a coherent response.

Source: IU+LV de Alhama de Murcia

Notice
UNE-EN ISO 9001:2000 - ER-0131/2006 Región de Murcia
© 2024 Alamo Networks S.L. - C/Alamo 8, 30850 Totana (Murcia) Privacy policy - Legal notice - Cookies
Este sitio web utiliza cookies para facilitar y mejorar la navegación. Si continúas navegando, consideramos que aceptas su uso. Más información