Note integrity of IU:
Referring to item 2, in which realized by the Mayor of the Settlement budget for 2008, we must note that the information on this item on the website of the City is wrong, since no vote was taken, and it was only to report to the House from the mayor.
So IU + The Greens did not vote.
What he did do our Municipal Group, was to remember that violate the legal deadlines for submission and that this settlement should have taken place seven months ago, in March last.
In May 2006, congratulate the officials of this area, because virtually settlements had been made of the City Council up to date with the presentation of the 2004, 2005 and 2006, unfortunately this has not had the continuity needed for Finance Councillor .
In item 3, was extra-budgetary changes and credit recognition.
This situation arises because the municipal government spending has exceeded more than budgeted in 2007 to almost one and half million euros, with no credit in the relevant items to cover these expenses.
In IU + The Greens believe that when preparing a budget, which has the responsibility of government must be aware that working with limited resources and must be within budget.
Especially striking is what has happened with celebrations starting in 2007, endowed with â‚¬ 200,000 initially, with another 100,000 increase in October and we still find no budget bills for another â‚¬ 134,000.
In total and art of "birlibirloque" â‚¬ 430,000, more than double budgeted.
Upon payment of these bills there are different situations, there are those who have been offset by revenues to be done, others have claimed it has authorized the payment, the less fortunate and have not yet paid.
The file contained invoices for an amount of around â‚¬ 100,000 in extra work cleaning municipal buildings, made this year.
We understand that can not be included in the "File Credit Settlement 2007", to correspond to 2008.
Ask for an explanation about it and on the criterion that the Mayor has been used to determine that some have charged, others not.
To cover these more than 190 million pesetas, of excesses on the budget.
It relies on the incorporation of remnant Credit for previous investments have not been executed.
No doubt this is merely the demonstration of the lack of coordination between councils and lack of spending.
These tremendous force against budget imbalances extraordinary situations like action like this Settlement Recognition File Credit to save the situation.
We think, and said so in Parliament that those who committed excesses should be responsible for them and cut those items in the 2008 budget implementation.
In the Motion on the defense of the Tajo-Segura, outlined what has been the position of the United Left in the Region of Murcia to the possibility of elimination.
In the first place we stand for unity of action of all political and social forces of Murcia including agricultural trade unions in defending the Tajo-Segura.
Second denounced the demagogic use of water issues by the two main parties PP and PSOE Region.
And finally from the United Left + The Greens do in third place a call for responsible water policy in our region.
We seem almost grotesque that Mayor plenary start boasting of the excellent results of the settlement of 2007, to recognize that there is thereupon excesses in the budget of that year and that the City will cover the remaining investment not implemented in previous years.
Source: IU de Alhama de Murcia