Portal de Alhama de Murcia
www.portaldealhama.com
Three unique points shaped the agenda for a city where its importance emphasized the approval of the general account of 2012, record yields a full account of the economic performance of the past financial year, once practiced paying the same and produced the Intervention same for our council, informed by the Special Committee on Accounts and exposed to the public by the legal deadline.
One account, that despite its importance, it is a true reflection of what happened in fiscal year 2012, went on tiptoe because nothing was discussed about it and if on Annex which is incorporated on the same study and internal audit conducted on urban land use admitted between September 2007 and December 2009, up to the amount of nearly 28 million euros, with the statements made by the former corporation responsible for putting into question the economic reality that this report and notes that will be duly audited account to the upper body of the municipal accounts which is the Court of Auditors.
This was exposed by the government team at the hearing that was made in July of this year, both the mayor and the council of finance in which we explained the results of this audit report to all citizens, as was reflected in the governing pact between the two parties, and the commitment to include in this account was acquired gral.
and as a separate annex to the report by the municipal intervention after compilation work done by a technical committee headed by the intervention itself and where the secretary gral part.
responsible for the planning area and works and services, and our recruitment drive ayto.
Equally to compliance with the public commitment to clarify the fate of this money and be published on the official web page of our ayto was given.
The result was clear and defining, despite the statements made by the mayors of the former corporation on if there were 19 million as the popular mayor or 7 million as stated in the socialist mayor, the specific report only remaining 700,000 euros, a figure said ratified by the municipal treasury.
Of the 27 million, list of works that were funded with this money, which amounts to the amount of nearly 15 million and the remaining eleven, not having taken a differentiated budgeting and accounting, as required by the regulations incorporated book from 2007, and considering that in 2007 the former corporation with its absolute majority was unable to prepare an annual budget, made this money became part of the common fund payments which were fought against all payments of our council, it is impossible today to determine exactly what that amount is earmarked specifically, we talk about more than eleven million euros of which was not our overhead council, of all types (payroll, creditors, bills , contracts, services, grants ....).
This accounting anomaly has been held by the Court of Auditors shall be the authority to rule and its consequences if accounting that may be required, which in our view erroneously IU and demanded that ruled responsibilities and was required by the Department, a matter not within its jurisdiction and may even be branded as partisan by the same group if they have been proposed.
This group paid a claim, the only one gral account.
and on this same point, but not compromising anything of it but simply to ratify the report by intervention and by his own spokesman to note what was already evident, as is the commitment of this government to clarify destination and put them in the hands of the only body with jurisdiction to rule on the case before the alleged existence and claim financial responsibilities to their authors.
More surprising stance of the socialist party, having ruled on this journey where the amount of 28 million euros was spent, demanded explanations 1.8 million spent from 2004 to 2006, and appears perfectly reflected in the budgets of those years the destination of the same, even 2006 settled and approved by his administration.
Offside defending the Socialist spokesman who seemed more interested in blaming the current mayor to assume part of the responsibility of his group in the serious accounting error, is that councilors spent just as much as the council of the popular party, without control by municipal responsible then.
By the PSOE s tried to justify the indefensible grounds that it had paid outstanding bills that never were reflected in the budgets that they developed and that even in the case to be true, which is not considered for accounting any, in any case justify use of urban land use money, which by law is exclusively for social and investment purposes, to address current outstanding invoices.
Once again squandered an opportunity to recognize the serious mistakes made in the greatest time of economic waste in the history of our town, and to contribute, as is currently being done by the government team, to establish the necessary controls so that this never it can be repeated.
The remaining points, the unconditional support of all groups to continue fighting for the cases of violence against women and support women stole.
victims of this scourge., and support for the claims made by the agricultural and irrigation community in relation to the Segura basin plan, which the council echoed these claims have been reached by the representatives of this was done sector based on an external report to accompany and justify a series of claims directed to increase water supply of our resort, providing areas that have always been in danger of irrigable and given the scarcity of water wells that once restocked today of water thereto.
Source: Ciudadanos por Alhama
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies