Portal de Alhama de Murcia

www.portaldealhama.com

Alhama de Murcia - SpanishAlhama de Murcia - English
detail of Alhama de Murcia

 

PSOE - July 2012 Full Rating (01/08/2012)

The first point to debate, the quarterly report of delinquency, we found that the Socialist Party spokesman was right from the beginning of the term: it is a point of debate.

In this quarterly report, as in all previous from its inception through Law 15/2010 of 5 July, the City of Alhama continues to demonstrate an excellent ability to pay their suppliers, with only a few dozen bills the that, at the end of quarter, are outstanding.

But it is also true, as we revealed in the Information Commission, there is evidence to disfigure the report is submitted to the Ministry of Finance.

And we must seek to provide many more payments are made within the statutory period of payments which are made out.

Which has not happened this quarter with 227 payments on time and 1114 out of time.

Among those who have not been paid, we find some new bills on these reports, not recognized as 2006 and 2007, or various councils of the PP in the previous corporation.

We hope to continue recognizing no prescription.

The Socialist Group voted in favor as in previous quarterly reports, but not to show again, taking into account our observations, which is very difficult.

The second point was the amendment to the Agreement on Implementation of Urban Paramount Park.

Our position is clear and the same from the beginning: we support but always putting the legal, economic infrastructure and the benefit of all and alhameņas alhameņos.

While we would have liked the original approach for one reason or another has not gone ahead, do not refuse the amendment, as long as they act with full guarantees.

We revealed something fundamental for us, and is not to demagogy or mimes to something big is about to see and maybe you are creating too much hope to many people hoping to find their jobs there.

The third point on the naming of several streets in town and in the industrial area.

We voted for the 4 proposed by the PP and CCD, and the two blocks assigned to our group, we will propose names after review and comment in the neighborhood.

In relation to point Rejection Drawing AVE in its variant on the Coast.

And as we have done since 2001, we joined the unanimous rejection of this variant on the grounds that only affects negatively.

The fifth point was IU's Motion municipal group-THE GREEN on "rejection of the Municipality of Alhama de Murcia-cutting measures to the Economic and Social Rights proposed by the President of the Nation."

For the PSOE and all its municipal group, consideration of all these measures are complete and utter rejection of unfair, divisive and ineffective.

Unfair and unsupportive because they are against the same sectors affected in previous such measures, but multiplied by three and without proper escalation.

E ineffective because it has been found that measures of reduction in wages, as in this case with the suspension of the Christmas bonus, and will from a dry brake consumption by more than 3 million people, fell even more intense economic activity, lower tax revenues and higher unemployment.

We also express, as does the motion, on the announcement of Rajoy to restrict powers and democratic pluralism in city councils, announcing the future reduction of 30% of Councillors.

This Rajoy announced deep cuts between measures of economic and social, is demagoguery and cheap, because it will mean a 30% reduction in cost of Corporations, as they may think our neighbors.

Our vote was in favor.

The PP against.

The argument, which already sensed: the inheritance.

It appears that fail to recognize or recognized in his election and that, as with them in Alhama in Murcia and Valcárcel, with the mere fact of getting the Moncloa Rajoy would be enough to restore confidence in Spain.

And is not that they recovered, they have lost all, by their forms and substance.

The problem is that we are paying for everyone.

But more striking were the arguments of the CCD, Angel Canovas, to abstain.

He also speaks of inheritance, but local.

No one can speak of inheritances received, in reply to betray their electoral programs, when no one knew better economic numbers and municipal, and national.

Angel Canovas, he did, was "superconcejal" for 8 years as Minister Rajoy, and 4 years leader of the opposition, as it was 8 years Rajoy.

17 years as President of the Region Valcárcel has led to ruin.

NO can be treated and the alhameņos, to Murcia, the Spanish.

You can not insult the intelligence and citizens.

We also want to show that, in similar terms, the socialist municipal group presented for discussion a motion that the Mayor refused, and he does not understand or assume that things should be discussed and, if approved by vote or position of each municipal group.

Clearly demonstrates once again his little democratic spirit and is a Mayor of the PP and not all alhameņos.

Powerlessness of GMS to the arrogance of the Mayor and a switch of Sebastian and Angel Canovas.

Mayor's arrogance for refusing to carry our plenary motions, our proposals, the now-and-switch PP spokesman Sebastian Moreno and Angel Canovas, again Councillor of Finance and Planning, who want us to forget one of his claims in the last legislature, that the motions be debated in Parliament.

On the last point, question and answer, and as usual, revealed the lack of solvency of the government team, do not know, no answer or summons us to "we'll see" "maybe" or " the best. "

In this full even exceeded, by means of education and lack of respect for the plurality voted by alhameņos.

Source: PSOE Alhama de Murcia

Notice
UNE-EN ISO 9001:2000 - ER-0131/2006 Regiķn de Murcia
© 2024 Alamo Networks S.L. - C/Alamo 8, 30850 Totana (Murcia) Privacy policy - Legal notice - Cookies
Este sitio web utiliza cookies para facilitar y mejorar la navegación. Si continúas navegando, consideramos que aceptas su uso. Más información