The contempt for the opposition and the authoritarian character of Mr. Mayor and his Team, characteristic of other times our parents knew very well, becomes latent after full full.
This time, opposition groups who are part of IU and PSOE-Green, asked Mr. Mayor on several occasions that, out of respect for those who decided to endorse the strike, changed the day of the full, and he replied with a NO resounding.
Another reason why this group notes with considerable concern the path of those who govern us, is his denial also included in the agenda of the joint motion-Greens presented IU and PSOE, in calling for a fairer location the new IES Valle de Leiva.
It is unfortunate that a Mayor who is supposed to be for everyone, only for his own rule.
He has the votes, but not the word.
After processing the first points in the fourth, about the allegations to the List of Jobs for 2012, there were three allegations.
Of the three, two rejected and was estimated.
We abstained because our group does not understand why some are estimated based on the law and others that are also covered by the Act are dismissed.
We think of an inconsistency and lack of total clarity.
The fifth point, Exclusion of Public Roads Inventory-called "Casa del Cava", "Secure Canada" and "Casa Alta and Los Riveros," our vote was in favor, how could it be otherwise, since there is a sentence that condemns the City Council to withdraw these public roads inventory.
In Section Six, Amendment No. 3, the PGMO, ranching, our group made some suggestions that we hope will be taken into account as it is to be included in the ordinance regulating livestock licensing, which currently provides DG irrigation, and to expedite this process are regulated rates meters of construction and for small buildings is the City Council to award.
Our vote was favorable
Again be latent contempt that this government team poured over the opposition at the point where partially estimate the claims presented by the Hospitality Association of Alhama de Murcia and also brings to the final approval of the ordinance regulating the occupation of the Roads and Public Spaces with terraces.
Councilman again turn a deaf ear to suggestions that this group did in its initial approval and remains committed to swim and eat and try to get along with everyone promising things that are not reflected in the ordinance.
An ordinance approved on terms is the same for everyone.
No exceptions can be made after approval, because he wants or says so.
Aspects such as the furniture can not carry advertising, and must keep an aesthetic was something that this political group claimed responsibility, since it seems an absurdity to take into account this aspect both for the old town and suburban bars, which is a additional cost for hoteliers only by the whim of Mr. Alderman, D.
We also found an absurdity that Mr. Alderman did not take into account in the development of this ordinance the contributions of the restaurateurs who are the real hit.
At the point of question and answer, the Speaker read a statement Pepe Swords by denouncing the attitude of the Mayor for the way we manage our petition to change the date of the plenary, prior to our departure from the House.
As expected, the Mayor launched the legs over with arguments out of context.
We sign, not water, on the balcony of City Hall, "Water for All".
But what we have is a mayor for all alhameņos and alhameņas.
Any other business.
GM statement prior to abandonment Socialist plenary.
Our Constitution in Chapter I, RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, and within your section I, FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS PUBLIC, Article 28.2 recognizes the right of workers to strike to defend their interests.
The fact remains that in SECTION II, OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITIZENS Article 35 mentions that the Spanish people have a duty to work and the right to work.
We will not pursue a relationship of supremacy of one right over another, but to do it the right to strike would prevail, for framed within the fundamental rights that our Constitution gives them special treatment.
Sometimes certain rights conflict in these cases is to seek consensus and even make concessions, so that nobody gets very hurt, getting in return other great benefits.
But seek consensus and compromise even less, is something that this government team does not know or will not do.
A mayor is an entire village, we reprimanded in the past, but it is becoming increasingly clear that you will more than mayor of Alhama, serves as mayor of the PP.
They are asking the Board of Spokesmen, I reiterate the Information Commission.
It would have been very easy to change the day of Parliament.
It has been done on other occasions, with reasons as to coincide with FITUR or unfolded as today's Serenade to the Virgin of Sorrows, when they were full at 21.00.
It has been done in other municipalities, including mayors of the same political tendency, but in this case you and your team of government have not agreed to the request of the opposition, so arrogant and inappropriate arguments like "I'll have to be here, I'm not gonna go on strike, so full is when. "
We find this attitude a contempt for the opposition councilors who made the request, but the contempt he does to several thousand alhameņos that regardless of who voted or ideology are, consider that the labor reform agreed by the Government Rajoy is unjust, and unnecessary.
He began to see their true intentions even before Mayor, when the inaugural session opened the door of the hall once the family and friends of the PP and its partners were accommodated in the CCD plenary hall, he has continued to see in decisions and behaviors such as cutting the time for the full intervention of the Opposition or obstacles get in order to present and discuss motions, lies expressed by him on the new IES Valle de Leiva, which has not had the decency to bring the motion to discuss UI-PSOE, etc.
We wanted to attend the plenary and discuss agenda items, and those who did not want to bring, because our obligation to do so as members of this corporation required to do so, but out of solidarity with alhameņos think that this strike is necessary because this labor reform seriously hurt them, we leave this Chamber.
Source: PSOE Alhama de Murcia